My Account: A Reported Relationship Between a 15-Year-Old Girl and My Father at 24

A correction to my father's estimated age

I found a TruePeopleSearch listing that gives my father's birth month and year as November 1972. My previous estimate of his age was based on his reported high school graduation year, not a verified birth date. A graduation year alone does not establish someone's age.

If this listing is accurate and identifies my father correctly, the age calculations would be as follows. His exact age on any particular occasion depends on whether it happened before or after his November birthday.

• 1990: he would have been 17 before his birthday and turned 18 in November.
• 1993: he would have been 20 before his birthday and turned 21 in November.
• 1996: he would have been 23 before his birthday and turned 24 in November, not 21 as I previously estimated.
• 1999: he would have been 26 before his birthday and turned 27 in November, not around 24 as I previously estimated in the separate account.

Read the corresponding correction to the separate 1999 first-meeting context ↗

What this correction does and does not establish

This would mean my father was older during those periods than I originally understood. However, this is a public people-search listing, not a verified birth record. I am identifying the source of the revised estimate rather than presenting it as official confirmation. Neither the listing's accuracy nor its identification of my father has been independently established here.

This correction concerns my father's estimated age only. It does not establish the other person's exact age, confirm when any relationship began, or establish misconduct. The separate account's 1999 date describes when I understand my father first met that contributor, not when she says the later conduct occurred.

I am sharing this correction openly because accuracy matters. As more information becomes available, I will continue correcting the timeline and distinguishing what is documented from what still needs confirmation. The original screenshots remain unchanged, including my earlier age assumptions. Those assumptions should now be read with this correction.

What she told me about 1996

I located and contacted a woman who said she had dated my father, Luis Felippe Mora. In the conversation, she wrote: “We dated in 1996 so I know nothing about your dad in his adult hood years. We were both very young.” She also said she had not spoken to him in many years, probably since they broke up.

When I asked more about their ages, she wrote: “I was not 18 in 96. I don’t think you know how old I am”. That is the wording visible in the supplied screenshot. It says she was not 18; it does not, by itself, say whether she was younger or older than 18.

The rest of her response matters

I repeatedly asked what year she graduated, how old she was in 1996, and whether she was younger than my father. She did not give an exact age or graduation year in the supplied exchange. She wrote that she did not see how her personal information would help me.

She also wrote: “When I dated your dad we were young. Nothing was abnormal about him. I haven’t spoken to him since.” She expressed hope that I could work things out with my family. Those statements are part of her account, and I am including them rather than treating her unwillingness to answer my questions as an accusation against him.

Later, she referred to the possibilities that they could have been the same age, that she could have been older, or that he could have been older. She did not identify which applied. Her description of them as young does not give an exact age for either person.

The ages and timeline are not established

My current account is that she was 15 when my father was 24 during their relationship. I am reporting that information as Lucas, not presenting an independent finding. My headline identifies the ages I report. The material published here does not independently establish that both ages applied on the same date, and the earlier age information and birthday calculations below still need to be reconciled with the exact timeline.

I understand my father's yearbook excerpt to come from New Milford High School in 1993. I previously assumed he was about 18 at graduation and used that to estimate he was about 21 in 1996. I have withdrawn that estimate in light of the listing described in my correction above. If November 1972 is accurate, he would instead have been 20 or 21 in 1993 and 23 or 24 in 1996. Neither the yearbook nor these messages establish a verified birth date.

I initially estimated her age from incomplete information. I now report that she later told me she was 13 in 1993, the year I identify as my father's graduation year, and that she was about 15 and in high school when he reached out to her. This clarification is my account of information she shared with me, not a statement visible in the supplied screenshots. I have not supplied a separate record of that clarification or a confirmed birth date. I cannot list either person's estimated age as confirmed.

She identifies 1996 as a year when they dated in the messages. Her reported age of 13 in 1993 and about 15 when he reached out do not establish an exact contact or relationship start date. Those details still need to be reconciled with birthdays and the reported 1996 timeframe. My revised estimate of my father's age does not resolve her age or identify how old either person was when contact began. A number in a username is not proof of a birth year, and “not 18” by itself does not mean “under 18.”

In this October 1 update, I also report her birth year as 1980. That is information I am providing, not a birth date established by her username or by the supplied screenshots. If that year is accurate, she would have been twelve before her birthday in 1993 and thirteen afterward, and fifteen or sixteen in 1996. I have not supplied a birth record or her exact birthday. The year alone cannot establish her school grade, how they met, or whether both ages in my existing headline applied at the same time.

Some of my own messages in the screenshots go further than the evidence supports, including my statements that I knew she was underage and that the relationship was illegal. Those are assertions I made in the exchange, not facts established by it. The screenshots do not establish a sexual relationship, an offence, or wrongdoing.

I am still asking whether the relationship could have begun before 1996. That possibility has not been independently confirmed, and nothing in the supplied exchange establishes a start date before that year.

The reported 1996 relationship would be approximately three years before the 1999 first-meeting timeframe I describe in the primary anonymous account. That 1999 timeframe is my account of when my father first met that contributor, not a statement that the conduct she later described began then. The two accounts remain distinct.

Read the first-meeting context in the featured anonymous account ↗

View the supplied yearbook excerpt and its source limitations ↗

Compare the separate accounts in the reported accounts timeline ↗

See how these screenshots are listed with the other published sources ↗

What is confirmed

Here, confirmed means visible in the supplied messages, not independent verification of the underlying relationship or anyone's age. My statement about retaining the conversation is my own report.

• She says she dated my father in 1996.
• She explicitly writes that she was not 18 in 1996, without giving her age.
• She describes them as young and says that nothing was abnormal about him when they dated.
• I have preserved the conversation. The gallery below contains supplied, overlapping excerpts, not a complete independently authenticated conversation record.

What is still being investigated

These are unresolved questions, not findings. Declining to answer, a username, a blocked or unavailable profile, and silence do not independently prove an allegation.

• Her exact age when contact and the relationship began, and how the later age information I report fits with the 1996 timeframe in the messages.
• Whether the TruePeopleSearch listing accurately identifies my father and gives his correct birth month and year, and his exact age on the relevant dates in 1996.
• Whether the relationship began before 1996.
• The complete timeline and circumstances of the relationship.